In my opinion though they are in no way flimsy and the soles are still durable in feel. Both boots bend, but the Tour is more pliable since they’re designed to fold in half or roll up more easily. Style: Both have the classic boot shape with rubber ridged soles and decorative ( not functional) buckle on the side. UPDATE: I’ve had my Tour boots for many years now and have not had any issues with any of the pairs. They are made of thinner more pliable rubber, and I do want to point out that they are excluded from Hunter’s typical 12 month warranty. Weight: My favorite aspect of the Tour by far though is the lightness – despite being several inches taller than the kids boots, the Tours are still noticeably lighter. Please note that as with all boots, shaft height and width likely increases as the foot size goes up. Both are decently slim in the calves (I don’t expect a glove-like fit for functional rubber shoes), and one difference is the kids’ calf circumference at the widest point is the same as the leg opening, whereas the Tour tapers and gets a little slimmer at the opening which I like, since it mirrors how our calves narrow in right below the knees. For reference, I am ~5 feet tall and my calves measure about 12.5″ around at the widest point. J.Crew skirt (old), Ann Taylor sweater, ASOS scarfįit: the two are super similar in width but the Tour is obviously taller, which I think has a more lengthening effect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |